rev·o·lu·tion
/ˌrevəˈlo͞oSHən/
Noun.
A forcible overthrow of a government or social order for a new system.


moresdystopia:

conservativerevolution:

States with the fewest welfare recipients have the best economies.Only 2 states out of the top 10 best state economies in the nation have more than 40,000 welfare recipients. California, which has the one of the worst economies in the nation, has over a million welfare recipients.More welfare = worse economy. It’s simple mathematics.Source:http://www.statemaster.com/graph/eco_wel_cas_tot_rec-economy-welfare-caseloads-total-recipientshttp://www.alternet.org/economy/152187/the_10_states_with_the_best_economies_in_america/ 

Well, yes… but it could (more) easily be said that worse economy = more people on welfare.

Silliness. The economy sucks BECAUSE of the policies those states use, including allowing hundreds of thousands on welfare. Free handouts = less revenue for other state programs like crime prevention, education and infrastructure improvements that would create jobs. Your equation is both wrong and less easy. More welfare = worse economy.

moresdystopia:

conservativerevolution:

States with the fewest welfare recipients have the best economies.
Only 2 states out of the top 10 best state economies in the nation have more than 40,000 welfare recipients. California, which has the one of the worst economies in the nation, has over a million welfare recipients.
More welfare = worse economy. It’s simple mathematics.

Source:
http://www.statemaster.com/graph/eco_wel_cas_tot_rec-economy-welfare-caseloads-total-recipients

http://www.alternet.org/economy/152187/the_10_states_with_the_best_economies_in_america/
 

Well, yes… but it could (more) easily be said that worse economy = more people on welfare.

Silliness. The economy sucks BECAUSE of the policies those states use, including allowing hundreds of thousands on welfare. Free handouts = less revenue for other state programs like crime prevention, education and infrastructure improvements that would create jobs. Your equation is both wrong and less easy.
More welfare = worse economy.


11 months ago on 19/7/2012 - 59 notes ( via / ©)

  1. victor2k reblogged this from pipius
  2. pipius reblogged this from mrconservative101
  3. thegreatcompromise reblogged this from thefreelioness and added:
    For me, I really don’t care if the State can or cannot provide welfare more efficiently than voluntarism, or if...
  4. sylphaeon reblogged this from maxlibertarios
  5. ragingcommonsense reblogged this from conservativerevolution
  6. informationaction reblogged this from thefreelioness
  7. libertariantaoist reblogged this from thefreelioness
  8. shane-roulette reblogged this from thefreelioness
  9. libertyfan93 reblogged this from maxlibertarios
  10. maxlibertarios reblogged this from thefreelioness
  11. theconflictedlibertarian reblogged this from thefreelioness
  12. nekogakawaku reblogged this from allison-coopersmith and added:
    I have to point out that there’s some serious issues with directional causation here. Which makes more sense, that high...
  13. island-of-me reblogged this from allison-coopersmith
  14. frat-rickhenry990 reblogged this from americas-liberty
  15. blessingsofliberty reblogged this from americas-liberty
  16. allison-coopersmith reblogged this from conservativerevolution
  17. americas-liberty reblogged this from conservativerevolution
  18. conservativerevolution posted this